自己给自己颁奖!特朗普获首届FIFA和平奖 因凡蒂诺抛出争议言论(被指“自我加冕”,特朗普摘得首届FIFA和平奖,因凡蒂诺言论引发争议)
2026-02-03
Considering fact-checking options I’m thinking about the user's recent headline post. I should definitely ask if they want me to verify if it's true or provide some context. As of my last update in October 2024, there isn’t a FIFA Peace Award, and Trump hasn’t received an honor from FIFA, so it seems likely to be false or satire. If it's okay with the user, I can offer to fact-check it using sources.Providing FIFA context I need to offer some context regarding FIFA awards and share reasons to be skeptical. It’s important to mention controversies surrounding Infantino too. I can check reliable sources to ensure accuracy. I must avoid asserting unverified claims beyond my cutoff and not invent details. I should keep the final answer concise, asking a clarifying question while providing helpful preliminary information. Should I check if the user wants me to verify the news, provide context, or assist with rewriting?


你想让我核查这条消息的真假,还是要做背景解读/写成稿件?
要我做哪种:1) 事实核查并给出处;2) 背景与传播链分析;3) 帮你改写成评论/短评稿?
